<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ross Kemp Middle East: Gaza</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onenationmagazine.com/ross-kemp-gaza/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onenationmagazine.com/ross-kemp-gaza/</link>
	<description>One Nation Magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 03:30:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Gezza</title>
		<link>http://www.onenationmagazine.com/ross-kemp-gaza/comment-page-1/#comment-23191</link>
		<dc:creator>Gezza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenationmagazine.com/?p=3198#comment-23191</guid>
		<description>Cant wait for the Danny Dyer programme on gaza.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cant wait for the Danny Dyer programme on gaza.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.onenationmagazine.com/ross-kemp-gaza/comment-page-1/#comment-23061</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 14:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenationmagazine.com/?p=3198#comment-23061</guid>
		<description>&quot;it should have been danny dyer hosting: “this geezer’s propa nawty, he tried to blow himself up in a shopping mall.”&quot;

Have you not seen that they&#039;re actually making this - it&#039;s gonna be amazing!! I think it&#039;s called danny dyer a geezer in gaza, there&#039;s a fb group for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it should have been danny dyer hosting: “this geezer’s propa nawty, he tried to blow himself up in a shopping mall.”&#8221;</p>
<p>Have you not seen that they&#8217;re actually making this &#8211; it&#8217;s gonna be amazing!! I think it&#8217;s called danny dyer a geezer in gaza, there&#8217;s a fb group for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natan galkowicz</title>
		<link>http://www.onenationmagazine.com/ross-kemp-gaza/comment-page-1/#comment-20832</link>
		<dc:creator>Natan galkowicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenationmagazine.com/?p=3198#comment-20832</guid>
		<description>I want to thank Ross for have the courage to come here, and make this two part program. Is the best ever made program made about the conflict between Palestinians and Israelis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to thank Ross for have the courage to come here, and make this two part program. Is the best ever made program made about the conflict between Palestinians and Israelis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.onenationmagazine.com/ross-kemp-gaza/comment-page-1/#comment-9114</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenationmagazine.com/?p=3198#comment-9114</guid>
		<description>Just in case there was some misunderstanding, DL Perry is mis-using history to state Zionists&#039; &#039;ancestral&#039; claims to the land known as Palestine (I can&#039;t say Israel, because Zionists are trying to claim the West Bank as well, which is not part of the UN agreement). This land has had many names - Canaan, Palestine, Outremar to name a few. It has been occupied by many forces - Romans, Arabs and Crusaders at different times. Zionists claim Jews were the first there, so they have the prime right to the area. But actually Jews drove out the original occupants - namely, Caananites - and seized the land for themselves. Their claims to be the first in the region are false, unless you include the first by conquest. In that case, any subsequent conquerors can claim an equal right. The business of being an ancestral homeland is based on nonsense. Whatever about the State of Israel as agreed under the UN in 1947, they have no business in the West Bank or expanding their borders in any other direction. Going all the way back to the mists of time won&#039;t help their cause here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in case there was some misunderstanding, DL Perry is mis-using history to state Zionists&#8217; &#8216;ancestral&#8217; claims to the land known as Palestine (I can&#8217;t say Israel, because Zionists are trying to claim the West Bank as well, which is not part of the UN agreement). This land has had many names &#8211; Canaan, Palestine, Outremar to name a few. It has been occupied by many forces &#8211; Romans, Arabs and Crusaders at different times. Zionists claim Jews were the first there, so they have the prime right to the area. But actually Jews drove out the original occupants &#8211; namely, Caananites &#8211; and seized the land for themselves. Their claims to be the first in the region are false, unless you include the first by conquest. In that case, any subsequent conquerors can claim an equal right. The business of being an ancestral homeland is based on nonsense. Whatever about the State of Israel as agreed under the UN in 1947, they have no business in the West Bank or expanding their borders in any other direction. Going all the way back to the mists of time won&#8217;t help their cause here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D L Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.onenationmagazine.com/ross-kemp-gaza/comment-page-1/#comment-8782</link>
		<dc:creator>D L Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenationmagazine.com/?p=3198#comment-8782</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe the amount of vicious ignorance there is here. So much moral and political righteousness, so much unsubstantiated dogma, paraded as knowledge of the facts. 

Adam B says: &quot;The media is totally biased towards the israeli’s.&quot; If only. Provide us with say, ten examples then. Oh well, maybe one? This is why we need better coverage of the Middle East and the Israel/Palestine issue, because the media, generally, is so systematically biased against Israel. Especially the BBC. Read the dispatches by Tom Gross or Honest Reporting. Learn about the actual history of the problem and you will see.

But Dave says: &quot;The whole conflict is due to Israel’s occupation.&quot; How naive. The problem with Israel is not that it occupies anything but the space it - Israel itself - is on. The problem is its very existence and this has an ancient historical context which is lost on most. Everything else is merely secondary. The Jews were persecuted by the Romans, but have a special place in Islamic literature and theology: in the Qur&#039;an and Hadith they are depicted as Islam&#039;s eternal enemy. The Jews have been demonised since the inception of Islam, when Muhammad said `there shall not be two religions on the [Arabian] peninsula.&#039; Thus the problem is not `Zionism&#039; but rather an uncompromising ideology - Islam - which makes no room whatsoever for a Jewish state: especially in lands once conquered by Islam there can be no relenting in aspirations for a return to Islamic rule. Do I need to remind anyone that as soon as Israel was announced in 1948 it was invaded by 8 surrounding Arab states? All Arab animosity towards Israel stems from this historical non-acceptance of a Jewish state in what was once part of the Islamic Caliphate.

To get this crystal clear: Israel was not built on &#039;stolen land&#039;. It was in fact built upon land which Jews have lived since the second millennium BC, under Joshua and King David. The Romans took over the Jewish kingdom following its revival in 168 BC, suppressing a number of revolts. `Palestine&#039; was the name given to the Kingdom of Judea by the Romans in order to de-Judaise it after the Philistines, earlier coastal inhabitants. There were no `Palestinians&#039;. Later, in the 7th Century, the Jews who lived in Jericho included refugees from Muhammad&#039;s bloody massacre and expulsion of the Jewish tribes living on the Arab peninsula. According to Islamic sources trusted by Muslims (Ibn Ishaq) the men of the Jewish Qurayzah tribe were mass murdered by decapitation and the women sold into slavery; other Jewish tribes including the Khaybar were driven from the peninsula to settle in modern-day Israel.

There were no people known as the &quot;Palestinians&quot; - they were, and are, simply Arabs. There was never a &quot;Palestinian&quot; state or homeland. This was acknowledged at the First Congress of Muslim-Christian Associations in Jerusalem, February 1919, which convened to choose &quot;Palestinian&quot; representatives for the Paris Peace Conference; they adopted following resolution: &quot;We consider Palestine as part of Arab Syria, as it has never been separated from it at any time. We are connected with it by national, religious, linguistic, natural, economic and geographical bonds.&quot; Furthermore, the statement from the representative of the Arab Higher Committee to the United Nations submitted to the General Assembly in May 1947 said that &quot;Palestine was part of the Province of Syria&quot; and that, &quot;politically, the Arabs of Palestine were not independent in the sense of forming a separate political entity.&quot; Ahmed Shuqeiri, later the chairman of the PLO, told the Security Council a few years later &quot;It is common knowledge that Palestine is nothing but southern Syria.&quot; The myth of the &quot;Palestinians&quot; is sadly a bi-product of Arab Muslim geopolitics, a tool to wrench land from the Jews, the hatred of which is deeply entrenched in Islamic scripture, law and culture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe the amount of vicious ignorance there is here. So much moral and political righteousness, so much unsubstantiated dogma, paraded as knowledge of the facts. </p>
<p>Adam B says: &#8220;The media is totally biased towards the israeli’s.&#8221; If only. Provide us with say, ten examples then. Oh well, maybe one? This is why we need better coverage of the Middle East and the Israel/Palestine issue, because the media, generally, is so systematically biased against Israel. Especially the BBC. Read the dispatches by Tom Gross or Honest Reporting. Learn about the actual history of the problem and you will see.</p>
<p>But Dave says: &#8220;The whole conflict is due to Israel’s occupation.&#8221; How naive. The problem with Israel is not that it occupies anything but the space it &#8211; Israel itself &#8211; is on. The problem is its very existence and this has an ancient historical context which is lost on most. Everything else is merely secondary. The Jews were persecuted by the Romans, but have a special place in Islamic literature and theology: in the Qur&#8217;an and Hadith they are depicted as Islam&#8217;s eternal enemy. The Jews have been demonised since the inception of Islam, when Muhammad said `there shall not be two religions on the [Arabian] peninsula.&#8217; Thus the problem is not `Zionism&#8217; but rather an uncompromising ideology &#8211; Islam &#8211; which makes no room whatsoever for a Jewish state: especially in lands once conquered by Islam there can be no relenting in aspirations for a return to Islamic rule. Do I need to remind anyone that as soon as Israel was announced in 1948 it was invaded by 8 surrounding Arab states? All Arab animosity towards Israel stems from this historical non-acceptance of a Jewish state in what was once part of the Islamic Caliphate.</p>
<p>To get this crystal clear: Israel was not built on &#8217;stolen land&#8217;. It was in fact built upon land which Jews have lived since the second millennium BC, under Joshua and King David. The Romans took over the Jewish kingdom following its revival in 168 BC, suppressing a number of revolts. `Palestine&#8217; was the name given to the Kingdom of Judea by the Romans in order to de-Judaise it after the Philistines, earlier coastal inhabitants. There were no `Palestinians&#8217;. Later, in the 7th Century, the Jews who lived in Jericho included refugees from Muhammad&#8217;s bloody massacre and expulsion of the Jewish tribes living on the Arab peninsula. According to Islamic sources trusted by Muslims (Ibn Ishaq) the men of the Jewish Qurayzah tribe were mass murdered by decapitation and the women sold into slavery; other Jewish tribes including the Khaybar were driven from the peninsula to settle in modern-day Israel.</p>
<p>There were no people known as the &#8220;Palestinians&#8221; &#8211; they were, and are, simply Arabs. There was never a &#8220;Palestinian&#8221; state or homeland. This was acknowledged at the First Congress of Muslim-Christian Associations in Jerusalem, February 1919, which convened to choose &#8220;Palestinian&#8221; representatives for the Paris Peace Conference; they adopted following resolution: &#8220;We consider Palestine as part of Arab Syria, as it has never been separated from it at any time. We are connected with it by national, religious, linguistic, natural, economic and geographical bonds.&#8221; Furthermore, the statement from the representative of the Arab Higher Committee to the United Nations submitted to the General Assembly in May 1947 said that &#8220;Palestine was part of the Province of Syria&#8221; and that, &#8220;politically, the Arabs of Palestine were not independent in the sense of forming a separate political entity.&#8221; Ahmed Shuqeiri, later the chairman of the PLO, told the Security Council a few years later &#8220;It is common knowledge that Palestine is nothing but southern Syria.&#8221; The myth of the &#8220;Palestinians&#8221; is sadly a bi-product of Arab Muslim geopolitics, a tool to wrench land from the Jews, the hatred of which is deeply entrenched in Islamic scripture, law and culture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.onenationmagazine.com/ross-kemp-gaza/comment-page-1/#comment-8708</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 02:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenationmagazine.com/?p=3198#comment-8708</guid>
		<description>As a Neutral all my life, i have to admit the i dont know why i supported Israel. My eyes have been opened. Children witnessing death of parents is disguting. How can you take someones land because god told you so. For the sake of the argument i can imagine how a palestinian feels, i can&#039;t imagine someone coming over to my house and taking or ocuupying it because god told them to. Gosh what a weak argument to steal land.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Neutral all my life, i have to admit the i dont know why i supported Israel. My eyes have been opened. Children witnessing death of parents is disguting. How can you take someones land because god told you so. For the sake of the argument i can imagine how a palestinian feels, i can&#8217;t imagine someone coming over to my house and taking or ocuupying it because god told them to. Gosh what a weak argument to steal land.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abu Aqilah</title>
		<link>http://www.onenationmagazine.com/ross-kemp-gaza/comment-page-1/#comment-8603</link>
		<dc:creator>Abu Aqilah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenationmagazine.com/?p=3198#comment-8603</guid>
		<description>I have seen neither programme as I&#039;m not prepared to pay a bean to Murdoch&#039;s coffers. However, reading Sky&#039;s previews of the series suggested to me that this was simply a Zionist-inspired PR campaign; the comments above do little to dispel that suspicion. Let me just throw one fact into the mix that I am sure that reknown investigative journalist will have failed to mention (let alone know). Sderot, this terrorised town of innocent, peace-loving civilians was originally the site of a Palestinian village, Najd, which was ethnically cleansed by Jewish soldiers in 1948, the Arab population being expelled to Gaza. Thereafter the village was levelled to the ground. Sderot was build over this site in 1951. So, when rockets are fired into Sderot from Gaza, the Gazans are firing rockets at the occupiers of their stolen land.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen neither programme as I&#8217;m not prepared to pay a bean to Murdoch&#8217;s coffers. However, reading Sky&#8217;s previews of the series suggested to me that this was simply a Zionist-inspired PR campaign; the comments above do little to dispel that suspicion. Let me just throw one fact into the mix that I am sure that reknown investigative journalist will have failed to mention (let alone know). Sderot, this terrorised town of innocent, peace-loving civilians was originally the site of a Palestinian village, Najd, which was ethnically cleansed by Jewish soldiers in 1948, the Arab population being expelled to Gaza. Thereafter the village was levelled to the ground. Sderot was build over this site in 1951. So, when rockets are fired into Sderot from Gaza, the Gazans are firing rockets at the occupiers of their stolen land.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.onenationmagazine.com/ross-kemp-gaza/comment-page-1/#comment-8555</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenationmagazine.com/?p=3198#comment-8555</guid>
		<description>Just caught up with it last night, very balanced doc made for the people who don&#039;t fully understand. Of course, theres a lot more to know, it didn&#039;t go too deep but it showed the reason for the wall is a security measure and not a political one. This is a fact, and i am glad it was put across. When you have animals like the al Qud brigade and kids willing to get strapped up and blow themselves to kingdom come, there really is no argument. Peace will never come as long as Hamas are in power, it is a shame, as i want nothing more than for there to be a dual state solution, but who can blame Israeli civilians for not wanting to live in fear of the minority who seek revenge for government wrong-doings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just caught up with it last night, very balanced doc made for the people who don&#8217;t fully understand. Of course, theres a lot more to know, it didn&#8217;t go too deep but it showed the reason for the wall is a security measure and not a political one. This is a fact, and i am glad it was put across. When you have animals like the al Qud brigade and kids willing to get strapped up and blow themselves to kingdom come, there really is no argument. Peace will never come as long as Hamas are in power, it is a shame, as i want nothing more than for there to be a dual state solution, but who can blame Israeli civilians for not wanting to live in fear of the minority who seek revenge for government wrong-doings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddy</title>
		<link>http://www.onenationmagazine.com/ross-kemp-gaza/comment-page-1/#comment-8530</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenationmagazine.com/?p=3198#comment-8530</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t know where to start, but Ross Kemp lied at the beginning of part 1 when he said he wanted to understand the conflict. He certainly ignored the hardcore issues and meant to focus on secondary aspects of the conflict, which was created in the first place by the occupation of Gaza and the West Bank.

Killing civilians is  wrong, on both sides, but let me tell you: &quot;suicide bombings&quot; (started in the 90) is not the reason for the existence of the conflict nor the rockets (started after 2000).

The issue here is the injustice that the Palestinians had/have to live with for the past 60 years or so. As long as that justice is missing then I&#039;m afraid there will be always blood, suffering on both side and propaganda films like Ross Kemp who is clearly trying to clean up Israel&#039;s image in the west after it&#039;s criminal war on the people of Gaza.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know where to start, but Ross Kemp lied at the beginning of part 1 when he said he wanted to understand the conflict. He certainly ignored the hardcore issues and meant to focus on secondary aspects of the conflict, which was created in the first place by the occupation of Gaza and the West Bank.</p>
<p>Killing civilians is  wrong, on both sides, but let me tell you: &#8220;suicide bombings&#8221; (started in the 90) is not the reason for the existence of the conflict nor the rockets (started after 2000).</p>
<p>The issue here is the injustice that the Palestinians had/have to live with for the past 60 years or so. As long as that justice is missing then I&#8217;m afraid there will be always blood, suffering on both side and propaganda films like Ross Kemp who is clearly trying to clean up Israel&#8217;s image in the west after it&#8217;s criminal war on the people of Gaza.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seano</title>
		<link>http://www.onenationmagazine.com/ross-kemp-gaza/comment-page-1/#comment-8466</link>
		<dc:creator>Seano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onenationmagazine.com/?p=3198#comment-8466</guid>
		<description>Overall, the combination of this documentary and the second documentary on the state of Israel does provide useful context for the uninformed viewer. They include many of the arguments used by both sides, like the one about there being plenty of goods in Gaza, Sderot is under seige etc. I think the casual viewer of Sky News, while reinforced in their belief that Hamas are the main problem in Gaza, will have to conclude that the Israelis are the ones with all the cards and in fact are the root of the problem.
The contrast between the damage in Sderot and the devastation in Gaza couldn&#039;t be starker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overall, the combination of this documentary and the second documentary on the state of Israel does provide useful context for the uninformed viewer. They include many of the arguments used by both sides, like the one about there being plenty of goods in Gaza, Sderot is under seige etc. I think the casual viewer of Sky News, while reinforced in their belief that Hamas are the main problem in Gaza, will have to conclude that the Israelis are the ones with all the cards and in fact are the root of the problem.<br />
The contrast between the damage in Sderot and the devastation in Gaza couldn&#8217;t be starker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

